You Should Be Fracking Concerned

The EPA (USA) has just released their assessment of “Fracking” and its impact on water resources and it’s not pretty. 

By General Maddox.

Massive amounts of controversy still surrounds the unconventional gas mining industry. The procedure for extracting natural gas (methane) from the Earth is called hydraulic fracturing otherwise known as “Fracking”.  This entails drilling deep into the Earth, usually below ground water basins, and pumping a huge cocktail of chemicals mixed with sand to break apart sediment formations underground thus releasing the gas for capture above. It sounds rather innocuous when you say it like that but it’s far from it.

The Environmental Protection Agency in the United States (EPA) recently released its near five year long draft assessment entitled “Hydraulic Fracturing Drinking Water Assessment“. The report confirms what activists, whistleblowers, documentary film makers, citizens & residents situated near drilling sites already knew, Fracking is bad news and there’s definite reason for concern.

The EPA now admits that ground water and surface water resources have already been contaminated by fracking:

“We found specific instances where one or more mechanisms led to impacts on drinking water resources, including contamination of drinking water wells.”

The report does however seem to downplay this shocking admission by saying that “the number of identified cases is small compared to the number of hydraulically fractured wells”. This is a poor comparison considering some water sources in counties across the U.S have hundreds of wells in operation on top of them.

The report also looked at the implication of water usage by the fracking operations. Most of the U.S is currently suffering a severe drought and fracking, if you didn’t already know, uses a massive amount of water. Consider this, according to the assessment there are approximately 30,000 NEW wells each year (2011-2014). Each well uses 5.7 million Litres of water each year. That’s 171 Billion Litres of water that can never be consumed by a living creature ever again after it’s used in the fracking process. For Australian readers, that’s about 14.3% of the capacity of the Wivenhoe dam in Queensland every year just on mining!

Mining companies in the United States and around the world for that matter have always used slick P.R campaigns, NGO’s and even government spokespeople, including Obama, to reassure everyone that Fracking is safe and poses no threat to water sources and that drinking water contamination has never happened on record. 

If you recall that in Queensland a mining company went as far as using Qld NRL football great, Darren Lockyer, to reassure everyone that Fracking is safe, effective and poses no danger to residents around drill sites. 

Safe, effective and no danger… Where have we heard that before? Looks like the mining giants are using the same propaganda spin doctors the pharmaceutical industry uses. 

The assessment linked above unfortunately doesn’t go into the other major concerns about the unconventional gas mining industry. Namely air pollution, destruction of land and private property, earthquakes which videographer and researcher Dutchsinse covers in great detail. 

The enigmatic Erin Brockovich whom I’m sure most readers are aware of has eloquently listed 5 takeaways this report offers (Listed on her Facebook page)…

1. Oil and gas companies want you to know as little about fracking as possible. This EPA report offers no new research on whether fracking contaminates water supplies. Instead it relies on “available data and literature,” including previous investigations by state regulators into fracking-related water pollution. The main reason for this is that oil and gas companies did all they could to make gathering new data impossible. And they were able to do that because Congress and successive administrations have exempted them from so many federal pollution rules.

2. Opportunities abound for disaster. One thing the EPA’s report does detail is the many risks that fracking operations pose to drinking water both above and below ground—from mixing the fracking chemicals to injecting the fracking fluid into the well to handling the millions of gallons of toxic, radioactive waste water. So many ways that something could go wrong! Now you know why this report is more than 1,000 pages long.

3. Fracking is happening close to where we live. According to the EPA, “Between 2000 and 2013, approximately 9.4 million people lived within one mile of a hydraulically fractured well.”

4. Lots of fracking is also happening close to our water supplies. Again, according to the EPA: “Approximately 6,800 sources of drinking water for public water systems were located within one mile of at least one hydraulically fractured well … These drinking water sources served more than 8.6 million people year-round in 2013.” Suppose you’re lucky enough to live more than a mile from the nearest fracking site? EPA: “Hydraulic fracturing can also affect drinking water resources outside the immediate vicinity of a hydraulically fractured well.” What’s more, the EPA points out that in some places, such as Michigan, Illinois, Indiana, and Kentucky, fracking happens at relatively shallow depths, where “oil and gas resources and drinking water resources co-exist in the same formation.”

5. What they don’t know could hurt you. Of the 1,076 chemicals used in fracking that the EPA could identify, the agency was able to assess the chemical, physical, and toxicological properties for fewer than half. Of those, the majority have the potential to “persist in the environment as long-term contaminants.” Great, but how many of them are potentially carcinogenic? The EPA could find data for about 90 of them, but offered a bureaucratic shrug of the shoulders as to what level of exposure people might have to those carcinogens. Feeling reassured yet?

Erin Brickovich offered this summation and I couldn’t have said it better myself. 

We didn’t need 1,000 pages to figure out the obvious. We don’t even need 1,000 words. Here’s what we know: Fracking is a nationwide game of Russian roulette that puts an essential resource—drinking water—at risk every single day. The sooner it stops, the better.

What makes you think it’s any different in our own backyard? 


Tags: , ,

Categories: Australian-news, International-news

Author:General Maddox

Real News Australia was founded in 2012 and is Australia's leading alternative news site featuring; open source journalism, current news articles that actually matter, opinionated editorials, shared news items from Australia and around the world, documentary films & video clips. We are dedicated to talking about real issues, health news, world events, political events and deciphering the main stream media garbage in order to break the cycle of propaganda. Remember: "Journalism is printing what someone else does not want printed. Everything else is public relations." - George Orwell. Please share anything you feel is worth sharing and subscribe to our emails. This operation is run on a shoestring budget so any contributions are well received.


Subscribe to our RSS feed and social profiles to receive updates.

6 Comments on “You Should Be Fracking Concerned”

  1. June 18, 2015 at 7:11 pm #

    Reblogged this on TOTT News.

  2. June 19, 2015 at 6:21 am #

    Very informative summary.

    I’d like to see follow up on this report. A summary by yourself pehaps (@ General Maddox), and a response from the Federal Government.

    I’m currently following a petition requesting a Royal Commission into the effects of Fracking.

  3. June 19, 2015 at 11:08 am #

    Wake up people, this type of mining will and is poisoning the WATER!!

  4. Chris K
    June 23, 2015 at 4:22 pm #

    Some good news. Residents of Adelaide River NT have said no to fracking, ensuring this filthy industry can’t ruin the worlds most precious resource at least in this beautiful corner of the Territory.

%d bloggers like this: