PM Abbott Backflipped When Murdoch Media Keeps Pushing “Jab”

Categories: Home

Author:General Maddox

Real News Australia was founded in 2012 and is Australia's leading alternative news site featuring; open source journalism, current news articles that actually matter, opinionated editorials, shared news items from Australia and around the world, documentary films & video clips. We are dedicated to talking about real issues, health news, world events, political events and deciphering the main stream media garbage in order to break the cycle of propaganda. Remember: "Journalism is printing what someone else does not want printed. Everything else is public relations." - George Orwell. Please share anything you feel is worth sharing and subscribe to our emails. This operation is run on a shoestring budget so any contributions are well received.


Subscribe to our RSS feed and social profiles to receive updates.

4 Comments on “PM Abbott Backflipped When Murdoch Media Keeps Pushing “Jab””

  1. Brian Sibley
    May 1, 2015 at 9:25 am #

    Have a read of this one- (click on read more to see full post)Hi Mum, We need to ask ourselves what would be the reason Tony Abbott did not want to see his daughters injected with some foreign organisms, DNA cultured in a petri dish In a lab as a preventative against cervical cancer in 2006? (all vaccines and immunisations are cultured from ‘bits’. I will leave it that for now). Seems a logical explanation is that Tony does not trust the spiel or claims of safety the promoters of vaccinations continue to spew, not to mention the volumes of evidence now to the contrary.Oh the irony! Now  2015 and Tony says if you don’t vaccinate or immunise ‘your children’ the government  will implement oppressive coercion by way of  discriminatory financial imposition!                                                                                                                                                                                   Is oppressive discriminatory financial coercion a sound foundation for anything to build on? The talk of our freedom to speak (right to free speech and opinion) is pointless if we have no freedom to choose our actions!!! (say it or think it, just do not do it, or we will fine you even if you have no intent to harm and there is no victim! That’s a dictatorship by definition, is it not?) . Something else to ponder: if 100 people receive immunisation and 1 chooses not to get the jab, is that un-immunised 1 any threat to those who are immunised?I propose the evidence supports the answer is no! So what is the problem for those who choose not to get the jab, are they not a threat only to themselves? Logically so to speak! I know of some people who have had the flu jab and then they got the flu anyway. What be the reason for that I wonder?People need to start asking more questions!!!


    • May 1, 2015 at 9:28 am #

      Excellent points Brian. Common sense as always.

  2. Rick
    May 1, 2015 at 9:48 am #

    Brian, i personally could not agree more with your comments, one thing is true, if anyone gets a jab then they become a carrier for up to 28 days, that would then mean they should stay away from perfectly healthy people until they are cleared to be back in the population! Here, we see that you are of risk of catching ???? and that’s a concern so come into this room here so we can inject you with ???? so you don’t catch it from someone else. Many studies and research has pointed out that these jabs only last a few years while people infected organically have not only a better chance of overcoming the ???? but would have a life long set of anti bodies in their arsenal. What a sick joke, i said it when Murdock elected our new puppet “this new puppet holds a huge debt to the Murdock empire, so when and how will this new puppet begin paying back this debt on the blood sweat and tears of the real government”, THE PUBLIC?

%d bloggers like this: