Just what is it exactly that’s holding the “Climate Alarmists” argument together?
Image credit: Mick Horne Freelance Cartoonist.
By General Maddox.
(RealNewsAustralia) Former Prime Minister Julia Gillard famously lied to the people of Australia and slipped into power on the back of her quote, “There will be no carbon tax under the government I lead” to which she quickly set about putting one in place. Now more recently our current Prime Minister Tony Abbott gained a large chunk of votes to secure a win for his party in the 2013 election on yet more rhetoric promising to repeal the carbon tax if he gets the top job. Not only has this not been done but it now looks like it won’t happen at all.
That’s right folks, in one form or another the carbon tax is here to stay.
With the Greens and Labor holding the majority of power in the Upper House, and their staunch support for all things UN mandated, we’re sure to see Tony Abbott’s promise of getting the Carbon Tax repealed go up in smoke (or is it carbon dioxide?). However, my suspicion is that this was the plan all along. So long as he’s seen to be carrying out the will of his electorate he can table as much legislation he wants to get rid of the carbon tax. His supporters will be none the wiser. Like I said before, unless the Greens or Labor change their position, which they will not, the carbon tax is here to stay.
It doesn’t help that the main stream media outlets have taken sides on the non-issue of “climate change” instead of remaining unbiased. Point in case is the media coverage of the failed antarctic expedition to the South Pole where the research vessel the Academik Shokalskiy became trapped in the supposedly shrinking sea ice. Among other things the researchers, lead by Chris Turney of the University of New South Wales, were to study the reduction of polar ice due to so-called “global warming” or their new favourite catchphrase “climate change”.
None of main stream media outlets pointed out the irony of the situation. Even when the Chinese ship Xue Long (Snow Dragon) also became stuck in the expanded sea ice after a rescue attempt. To this day both ships remain frozen in place. TV news outlets helped divert public attention to what the crews were doing and how they’re safe and in “high spirits” rather than pointing out the obvious or questioning the need for such an expensive expedition.
The Guardian seemed to shoot down their own argument on the non-issue of climate change…
Some commentators have remarked on what they describe as the ‘irony’ of researchers studying the impact of a warming planet themselves being impeded by heavy ice. With some even suggesting that the situation is itself evidence that global warming is exaggerated.
In fact, the local weather patterns that brought about the rapid build up of ice that trapped the Academik Shokalskiy tell us very little about global warming. This is weather, not climate.
Without realising it I think they let the cat out of the bag. Global warming is a farce. Climate change has been happening since our planet was capable of having a climate. The changes we see, the extreme cold to the extreme heat, the tsunamis, the cyclones, the hurricanes, the severe storms…this is weather. A carbon tax isn’t going to change that.
The next logical step is to see who stands to gain from it. It came out in federal parliament question time that 10% of carbon tax collected in developed countries is going to the United Nations climate change fund. A fact withheld from the Australian public. So it would seem the global government known as the U.N is who stands to gain from taxing a substance essential for life on Earth. In fact plant life on Earth needs carbon dioxide. Without it there’s less food for everyone.
Then again perhaps that’s the missing link. Depopulation.
Real News Australia 
Great article, thanks. Since there has been NO global warming now for 17 years, of course these professional liars promoting the scam had to do a back peddle and introduce the new term ‘climate change’. They are smirking at the gullibility of the sheeple. What does the term climate change mean? Before man existed on earth there was climate changing, hourly, daily, monthly, yearly, every million years and on. Thus the psycopaths in the Club of Rome have it made!
Of course The Club of Rome, of which Al Gore is a member, have done an excellent job for their parent world ruling body, The Committee of 300 (see book of the same title by John Coleman if you want to know who really runs the world). Global (non) warming allows them to increasingly annihilate the middle class step by step as we will be seeing, as they send us to the poor house. It allows an excuse to bring in UN Agenda 21 which will step by step remove our private property and individual rights around the world, and allows them to put in place the global ‘smart’ (spy/silent weapons) grid. Only political leaders who are prepared to do the bidding of EARTH INC, as Al Gore’s book describes it, will ever be allowed to succeed. Democracy is dead. The One World Government ever advances, and the zombie masses’ attention remains diverted as they play with their ipods or watch sports ie fiddle while Rome burns.
Why is there no mention of Agenda 21..or the Trans Pacific Partnership in the main stream media? They are true “presstitutes”…owned by the same criminals that keep the ‘sheeple’ amused with reality TV..serials…sport..while drinking their aspartame laced diet drinks…fluoridated water..and thimerisol laced vaccines. The ‘dumbing down’ is working a treat..aided by the main stream media. Right now…my family are glued to the idiot box…drinking poison …or alcohol…and totally oblivious to situation unfolding around them.
It’s a sad state of affairs at the present. We need a paradigm shift. Those of us who are awake but can’t do what we do here at RNA should support people like us where they can or try and get this sort of information in front of the eyes of others.
Reblogged this on Neal Rews Australia.
Reblogged this on conspiracyoz.
The pieces of the Globalist Jigsaw are now coming together = ‘Rapid DePopulation’
The question of whether a carbon tax or emissions trading are appropriate as responses to climate change is a separate issue from whether climate change is just a scam. There are a number of points to make about this question, because the politics of it is more complex than a lot of people seem to realise. Firstly, in the IPCC discussions on climate change it was THE CLIMATE CHANGE SCEPTIC LOBBY that advocated non-”authoritarian” measures against climate change, against the preference of climate change activists. Similarly it has been the CLIMATE CHANGE SCEPTICS that have been the most wholehearted advocates of geoengineering techniques such as solar radiation management, more so than Al Gore and Green activists, who profess to “ambivalence” and say that geoengineering “may become inevitable if the sceptics don’t change their ideas. In other words a classic good cop/bad cop scenario. There is no point at all in taking sides with the bad cop when games of this kind are being played. The point of entry into the debate should be that both the good cops and the bad cops are complicit in the fiction that spraying, allegedly against the effects of “climate change” is not an entrenched global reality. And given that a full-scale public relations campaign is under way to secure public acceptance of the “necessity” for solar radiation management, there is no necessity for anti-spraying activists to prove anything. The onus is on advocates of geoengineering to prove that everything they say about it is true, including their sly fiction that it is not happening. If Dane Wigington’s pieces on geoengineering are accepted for publication, readers should pay attention to what he says about climate change scepticism.
it saddens and disgusts me to see assorted social media perpetuate farcical words like “climate change” when that was a word chosen FOR us so we wouldn’t investigate and ask uncomfortable questions.
I expect that kind of ignorance from politicians, not the rest of us, who should know better than to be deluded by their lies.
Whatever verbal diarrhea politicians and their sidekicks are spouting on the subject of ‘climate’, you can be sure it’s a lie – usually one designed to harm the general public, not help. Politicians will say and do anything to keep feathering their own short-sighted nests, no matter who it hurts, destroys or, in this case, poisons.
Try the Geoengineering Watch site on for size – particularly the video on this page: http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/climate-engineering-weather-warfare-and-the-collapse-of-civilization/
Grab every polly in the country, tie their sorry arses to a chair, and force them to watch it. Repeatedly. Until the reality sets in.
And then we go after the media mongrels – er – moguls.